This is one stop global knowledge base where you can learn about all the products, solutions and support features.
Hooks are a new addition in React 16.8. They let you use state and other React features without writing a class.
import React, { useState } from 'react';
function Example() {
// Declare a new state variable, which we'll call "count" const [count, setCount] = useState(0);
return (
<div>
<p>You clicked {count} times</p>
<button onClick={() => setCount(count + 1)}>
Click me
</button>
</div>
);
}
This new function
useState
is the first “Hook” we’ll learn about, but this example is just a teaser. Don’t worry if it doesn’t make sense yet!
You can start learning Hooks on the next page. On this page, we’ll continue by explaining why we’re adding Hooks to React and how they can help you write great applications.
Note
React 16.8.0 is the first release to support Hooks. When upgrading, don’t forget to update all packages, including React DOM.
React Native has supported Hooks since the 0.59 release of React Native.
At React Conf 2018, Sophie Alpert and Dan Abramov introduced Hooks, followed by Ryan Florence demonstrating how to refactor an application to use them. Watch the video here:
Before we continue, note that Hooks are:
There are no plans to remove classes from React. You can read more about the gradual adoption strategy for Hooks in the bottom section of this page.
Hooks don’t replace your knowledge of React concepts. Instead, Hooks provide a more direct API to the React concepts you already know: props, state, context, refs, and lifecycle. As we will show later, Hooks also offer a new powerful way to combine them.
If you just want to start learning Hooks, feel free to jump directly to the next page! You can also keep reading this page to learn more about why we’re adding Hooks, and how we’re going to start using them without rewriting our applications.
Hooks solve a wide variety of seemingly unconnected problems in React that we’ve encountered over five years of writing and maintaining tens of thousands of components. Whether you’re learning React, use it daily, or even prefer a different library with a similar component model, you might recognize some of these problems.
React doesn’t offer a way to “attach” reusable behavior to a component (for example, connecting it to a store). If you’ve worked with React for a while, you may be familiar with patterns like render props and higher-order components that try to solve this. But these patterns require you to restructure your components when you use them, which can be cumbersome and make code harder to follow. If you look at a typical React application in React DevTools, you will likely find a “wrapper hell” of components surrounded by layers of providers, consumers, higher-order components, render props, and other abstractions. While we could filter them out in DevTools, this points to a deeper underlying problem: React needs a better primitive for sharing stateful logic.
With Hooks, you can extract stateful logic from a component so it can be tested independently and reused. Hooks allow you to reuse stateful logic without changing your component hierarchy. This makes it easy to share Hooks among many components or with the community.
We’ll discuss this more in Building Your Own Hooks.
We’ve often had to maintain components that started out simple but grew into an unmanageable mess of stateful logic and side effects. Each lifecycle method often contains a mix of unrelated logic. For example, components might perform some data fetching in
componentDidMount
and
componentDidUpdate
. However, the same
componentDidMount
method might also contain some unrelated logic that sets up event listeners, with cleanup performed in
componentWillUnmount
. Mutually related code that changes together gets split apart, but completely unrelated code ends up combined in a single method. This makes it too easy to introduce bugs and inconsistencies.
In many cases it’s not possible to break these components into smaller ones because the stateful logic is all over the place. It’s also difficult to test them. This is one of the reasons many people prefer to combine React with a separate state management library. However, that often introduces too much abstraction, requires you to jump between different files, and makes reusing components more difficult.
To solve this, Hooks let you split one component into smaller functions based on what pieces are related (such as setting up a subscription or fetching data) , rather than forcing a split based on lifecycle methods. You may also opt into managing the component’s local state with a reducer to make it more predictable.
We’ll discuss this more in Using the Effect Hook.
In addition to making code reuse and code organization more difficult, we’ve found that classes can be a large barrier to learning React. You have to understand how
this
works in JavaScript, which is very different from how it works in most languages. You have to remember to bind the event handlers. Without ES2022 public class fields, the code is very verbose. People can understand props, state, and top-down data flow perfectly well but still struggle with classes. The distinction between function and class components in React and when to use each one leads to disagreements even between experienced React developers.
Additionally, React has been out for about five years, and we want to make sure it stays relevant in the next five years. As Svelte, Angular, Glimmer, and others show, ahead-of-time compilation of components has a lot of future potential. Especially if it’s not limited to templates. Recently, we’ve been experimenting with component folding using Prepack, and we’ve seen promising early results. However, we found that class components can encourage unintentional patterns that make these optimizations fall back to a slower path. Classes present issues for today’s tools, too. For example, classes don’t minify very well, and they make hot reloading flaky and unreliable. We want to present an API that makes it more likely for code to stay on the optimizable path.
To solve these problems, Hooks let you use more of React’s features without classes. Conceptually, React components have always been closer to functions. Hooks embrace functions, but without sacrificing the practical spirit of React. Hooks provide access to imperative escape hatches and don’t require you to learn complex functional or reactive programming techniques.
Examples
Hooks at a Glance is a good place to start learning Hooks.
TLDR: There are no plans to remove classes from React.
We know that React developers are focused on shipping products and don’t have time to look into every new API that’s being released. Hooks are very new, and it might be better to wait for more examples and tutorials before considering learning or adopting them.
We also understand that the bar for adding a new primitive to React is extremely high. For curious readers, we have prepared a detailed RFC that dives into the motivation with more details, and provides extra perspective on the specific design decisions and related prior art.
Crucially, Hooks work side-by-side with existing code so you can adopt them gradually. There is no rush to migrate to Hooks. We recommend avoiding any “big rewrites”, especially for existing, complex class components. It takes a bit of a mind shift to start “thinking in Hooks”. In our experience, it’s best to practice using Hooks in new and non-critical components first, and ensure that everybody on your team feels comfortable with them. After you give Hooks a try, please feel free to send us feedback, positive or negative.
We intend for Hooks to cover all existing use cases for classes, but we will keep supporting class components for the foreseeable future. At Facebook, we have tens of thousands of components written as classes, and we have absolutely no plans to rewrite them. Instead, we are starting to use Hooks in the new code side by side with classes.
We’ve prepared a Hooks FAQ page that answers the most common questions about Hooks.
By the end of this page, you should have a rough idea of what problems Hooks are solving, but many details are probably unclear. Don’t worry! Let’s now go to the next page where we start learning about Hooks by example.
Hooks are a new addition in React 16.8. They let you use state and other React features without writing a class.
Detailed Explanation
Read the Motivation to learn why we’re introducing Hooks to React.
↑↑↑ Each section ends with a yellow box like this. They link to detailed explanations.
This example renders a counter. When you click the button, it increments the value:
import React, { useState } from 'react';
function Example() {
// Declare a new state variable, which we'll call "count" const [count, setCount] = useState(0);
return (
<div>
<p>You clicked {count} times</p>
<button onClick={() => setCount(count + 1)}>
Click me
</button>
</div>
);
}
Here,
useState
is a
Hook
(we’ll talk about what this means in a moment). We call it inside a function component to add some local state to it. React will preserve this state between re-renders.
useState
returns a pair: the
current
state value and a function that lets you update it. You can call this function from an event handler or somewhere else. It’s similar to
this.setState
in a class, except it doesn’t merge the old and new state together. (We’ll show an example comparing
useState
to
this.state
in Using the State Hook.)
The only argument to
useState
is the initial state. In the example above, it is
0
because our counter starts from zero. Note that unlike
this.state
, the state here doesn’t have to be an object — although it can be if you want. The initial state argument is only used during the first render.
You can use the State Hook more than once in a single component:
function ExampleWithManyStates() {
// Declare multiple state variables!
const [age, setAge] = useState(42);
const [fruit, setFruit] = useState('banana');
const [todos, setTodos] = useState([{ text: 'Learn Hooks' }]);
// ...
}
The array destructuring syntax lets us give different names to the state variables we declared by calling
useState
. These names aren’t a part of the
useState
API. Instead, React assumes that if you call
useState
many times, you do it in the same order during every render. We’ll come back to why this works and when this is useful later.
Hooks are functions that let you “hook into” React state and lifecycle features from function components. Hooks don’t work inside classes — they let you use React without classes. (We don’t recommend rewriting your existing components overnight but you can start using Hooks in the new ones if you’d like.)
React provides a few built-in Hooks like
useState
. You can also create your own Hooks to reuse stateful behavior between different components. We’ll look at the built-in Hooks first.
Detailed Explanation
You can learn more about the State Hook on a dedicated page: Using the State Hook.
You’ve likely performed data fetching, subscriptions, or manually changing the DOM from React components before. We call these operations “side effects” (or “effects” for short) because they can affect other components and can’t be done during rendering.
The Effect Hook,
useEffect
, adds the ability to perform side effects from a function component. It serves the same purpose as
componentDidMount
,
componentDidUpdate
, and
componentWillUnmount
in React classes, but unified into a single API. (We’ll show examples comparing
useEffect
to these methods in Using the Effect Hook.)
For example, this component sets the document title after React updates the DOM:
import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react';
function Example() {
const [count, setCount] = useState(0);
// Similar to componentDidMount and componentDidUpdate: useEffect(() => { // Update the document title using the browser API document.title = `You clicked ${count} times`; });
return (
<div>
<p>You clicked {count} times</p>
<button onClick={() => setCount(count + 1)}>
Click me
</button>
</div>
);
}
When you call
useEffect
, you’re telling React to run your “effect” function after flushing changes to the DOM. Effects are declared inside the component so they have access to its props and state. By default, React runs the effects after every render —
including
the first render. (We’ll talk more about how this compares to class lifecycles in Using the Effect Hook.)
Effects may also optionally specify how to “clean up” after them by returning a function. For example, this component uses an effect to subscribe to a friend’s online status, and cleans up by unsubscribing from it:
import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react';
function FriendStatus(props) {
const [isOnline, setIsOnline] = useState(null);
function handleStatusChange(status) {
setIsOnline(status.isOnline);
}
useEffect(() => { ChatAPI.subscribeToFriendStatus(props.friend.id, handleStatusChange); return () => { ChatAPI.unsubscribeFromFriendStatus(props.friend.id, handleStatusChange); }; });
if (isOnline === null) {
return 'Loading...';
}
return isOnline ? 'Online' : 'Offline';
}
In this example, React would unsubscribe from our
ChatAPI
when the component unmounts, as well as before re-running the effect due to a subsequent render. (If you want, there’s a way to tell React to skip re-subscribing if the
props.friend.id
we passed to
ChatAPI
didn’t change.)
Just like with
useState
, you can use more than a single effect in a component:
function FriendStatusWithCounter(props) {
const [count, setCount] = useState(0);
useEffect(() => { document.title = `You clicked ${count} times`;
});
const [isOnline, setIsOnline] = useState(null);
useEffect(() => { ChatAPI.subscribeToFriendStatus(props.friend.id, handleStatusChange);
return () => {
ChatAPI.unsubscribeFromFriendStatus(props.friend.id, handleStatusChange);
};
});
function handleStatusChange(status) {
setIsOnline(status.isOnline);
}
// ...
Hooks let you organize side effects in a component by what pieces are related (such as adding and removing a subscription), rather than forcing a split based on lifecycle methods.
Detailed Explanation
You can learn more about
useEffect
on a dedicated page: Using the Effect Hook.
Hooks are JavaScript functions, but they impose two additional rules:
We provide a linter plugin to enforce these rules automatically. We understand these rules might seem limiting or confusing at first, but they are essential to making Hooks work well.
Detailed Explanation
You can learn more about these rules on a dedicated page: Rules of Hooks.
Sometimes, we want to reuse some stateful logic between components. Traditionally, there were two popular solutions to this problem: higher-order components and render props. Custom Hooks let you do this, but without adding more components to your tree.
Earlier on this page, we introduced a
FriendStatus
component that calls the
useState
and
useEffect
Hooks to subscribe to a friend’s online status. Let’s say we also want to reuse this subscription logic in another component.
First, we’ll extract this logic into a custom Hook called
useFriendStatus
:
import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react';
function useFriendStatus(friendID) { const [isOnline, setIsOnline] = useState(null);
function handleStatusChange(status) {
setIsOnline(status.isOnline);
}
useEffect(() => {
ChatAPI.subscribeToFriendStatus(friendID, handleStatusChange);
return () => {
ChatAPI.unsubscribeFromFriendStatus(friendID, handleStatusChange);
};
});
return isOnline;
}
It takes
friendID
as an argument, and returns whether our friend is online.
Now we can use it from both components:
function FriendStatus(props) {
const isOnline = useFriendStatus(props.friend.id);
if (isOnline === null) {
return 'Loading...';
}
return isOnline ? 'Online' : 'Offline';
}
function FriendListItem(props) {
const isOnline = useFriendStatus(props.friend.id);
return (
<li style={{ color: isOnline ? 'green' : 'black' }}>
{props.friend.name}
</li>
);
}
The state of each component is completely independent. Hooks are a way to reuse stateful logic , not state itself. In fact, each call to a Hook has a completely isolated state — so you can even use the same custom Hook twice in one component.
Custom Hooks are more of a convention than a feature. If a function’s name starts with ”
use
” and it calls other Hooks, we say it is a custom Hook. The
useSomething
naming convention is how our linter plugin is able to find bugs in the code using Hooks.
You can write custom Hooks that cover a wide range of use cases like form handling, animation, declarative subscriptions, timers, and probably many more we haven’t considered. We are excited to see what custom Hooks the React community will come up with.
Detailed Explanation
You can learn more about custom Hooks on a dedicated page: Building Your Own Hooks.
There are a few less commonly used built-in Hooks that you might find useful. For example,
useContext
lets you subscribe to React context without introducing nesting:
function Example() {
const locale = useContext(LocaleContext); const theme = useContext(ThemeContext); // ...
}
And
useReducer
lets you manage local state of complex components with a reducer:
function Todos() {
const [todos, dispatch] = useReducer(todosReducer); // ...
Detailed Explanation
You can learn more about all the built-in Hooks on a dedicated page: Hooks API Reference.
Phew, that was fast! If some things didn’t quite make sense or you’d like to learn more in detail, you can read the next pages, starting with the State Hook documentation.
You can also check out the Hooks API reference and the Hooks FAQ.
Finally, don’t miss the introduction page which explains why we’re adding Hooks and how we’ll start using them side by side with classes — without rewriting our apps.
Hooks are a new addition in React 16.8. They let you use state and other React features without writing a class.
The introduction page used this example to get familiar with Hooks:
import React, { useState } from 'react';
function Example() {
// Declare a new state variable, which we'll call "count" const [count, setCount] = useState(0);
return (
<div>
<p>You clicked {count} times</p>
<button onClick={() => setCount(count + 1)}>
Click me
</button>
</div>
);
}
We’ll start learning about Hooks by comparing this code to an equivalent class example.
If you used classes in React before, this code should look familiar:
class Example extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {
count: 0
};
}
render() {
return (
<div>
<p>You clicked {this.state.count} times</p>
<button onClick={() => this.setState({ count: this.state.count + 1 })}>
Click me
</button>
</div>
);
}
}
The state starts as
{ count: 0 }
, and we increment
state.count
when the user clicks a button by calling
this.setState()
. We’ll use snippets from this class throughout the page.
Note
You might be wondering why we’re using a counter here instead of a more realistic example. This is to help us focus on the API while we’re still making our first steps with Hooks.
As a reminder, function components in React look like this:
const Example = (props) => {
// You can use Hooks here!
return <div />;
}
or this:
function Example(props) {
// You can use Hooks here!
return <div />;
}
You might have previously known these as “stateless components”. We’re now introducing the ability to use React state from these, so we prefer the name “function components”.
Hooks don’t work inside classes. But you can use them instead of writing classes.
Our new example starts by importing the
useState
Hook from React:
import React, { useState } from 'react';
function Example() {
// ...
}
What is a Hook?
A Hook is a special function that lets you “hook into” React features. For example,
useState
is a Hook that lets you add React state to function components. We’ll learn other Hooks later.
When would I use a Hook? If you write a function component and realize you need to add some state to it, previously you had to convert it to a class. Now you can use a Hook inside the existing function component. We’re going to do that right now!
Note:
There are some special rules about where you can and can’t use Hooks within a component. We’ll learn them in Rules of Hooks.
In a class, we initialize the
count
state to
0
by setting
this.state
to
{ count: 0 }
in the constructor:
class Example extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = { count: 0 }; }
In a function component, we have no
this
, so we can’t assign or read
this.state
. Instead, we call the
useState
Hook directly inside our component:
import React, { useState } from 'react';
function Example() {
// Declare a new state variable, which we'll call "count" const [count, setCount] = useState(0);
What does calling
useState
do?
It declares a “state variable”. Our variable is called
count
but we could call it anything else, like
banana
. This is a way to “preserve” some values between the function calls —
useState
is a new way to use the exact same capabilities that
this.state
provides in a class. Normally, variables “disappear” when the function exits but state variables are preserved by React.
What do we pass to
useState
as an argument?
The only argument to the
useState()
Hook is the initial state. Unlike with classes, the state doesn’t have to be an object. We can keep a number or a string if that’s all we need. In our example, we just want a number for how many times the user clicked, so pass
0
as initial state for our variable. (If we wanted to store two different values in state, we would call
useState()
twice.)
What does
useState
return?
It returns a pair of values: the current state and a function that updates it. This is why we write
const [count, setCount] = useState()
. This is similar to
this.state.count
and
this.setState
in a class, except you get them in a pair. If you’re not familiar with the syntax we used, we’ll come back to it at the bottom of this page.
Now that we know what the
useState
Hook does, our example should make more sense:
import React, { useState } from 'react';
function Example() {
// Declare a new state variable, which we'll call "count" const [count, setCount] = useState(0);
We declare a state variable called
count
, and set it to
0
. React will remember its current value between re-renders, and provide the most recent one to our function. If we want to update the current
count
, we can call
setCount
.
Note
You might be wondering: why is
useState
not namedcreateState
instead?
“Create” wouldn’t be quite accurate because the state is only created the first time our component renders. During the next renders,
useState
gives us the current state. Otherwise it wouldn’t be “state” at all! There’s also a reason why Hook names always start withuse
. We’ll learn why later in the Rules of Hooks.
When we want to display the current count in a class, we read
this.state.count
:
<p>You clicked {this.state.count} times</p>
In a function, we can use
count
directly:
<p>You clicked {count} times</p>
In a class, we need to call
this.setState()
to update the
count
state:
<button onClick={() => this.setState({ count: this.state.count + 1 })}> Click me
</button>
In a function, we already have
setCount
and
count
as variables so we don’t need
this
:
<button onClick={() => setCount(count + 1)}> Click me
</button>
Let’s now recap what we learned line by line and check our understanding.
1: import React, { useState } from 'react'; 2:
3: function Example() {
4: const [count, setCount] = useState(0); 5:
6: return (
7: <div>
8: <p>You clicked {count} times</p>
9: <button onClick={() => setCount(count + 1)}>10: Click me
11: </button>
12: </div>
13: );
14: }
useState
Hook from React. It lets us keep local state in a function component.
Example
component, we declare a new state variable by calling the
useState
Hook. It returns a pair of values, to which we give names. We’re calling our variable
count
because it holds the number of button clicks. We initialize it to zero by passing
0
as the only
useState
argument. The second returned item is itself a function. It lets us update the
count
so we’ll name it
setCount
.
setCount
with a new value. React will then re-render the
Example
component, passing the new
count
value to it.
This might seem like a lot to take in at first. Don’t rush it! If you’re lost in the explanation, look at the code above again and try to read it from top to bottom. We promise that once you try to “forget” how state works in classes, and look at this code with fresh eyes, it will make sense.
You might have noticed the square brackets when we declare a state variable:
const [count, setCount] = useState(0);
The names on the left aren’t a part of the React API. You can name your own state variables:
const [fruit, setFruit] = useState('banana');
This JavaScript syntax is called “array destructuring”. It means that we’re making two new variables
fruit
and
setFruit
, where
fruit
is set to the first value returned by
useState
, and
setFruit
is the second. It is equivalent to this code:
var fruitStateVariable = useState('banana'); // Returns a pair
var fruit = fruitStateVariable[0]; // First item in a pair
var setFruit = fruitStateVariable[1]; // Second item in a pair
When we declare a state variable with
useState
, it returns a pair — an array with two items. The first item is the current value, and the second is a function that lets us update it. Using
[0]
and
[1]
to access them is a bit confusing because they have a specific meaning. This is why we use array destructuring instead.
Note
You might be curious how React knows which component
useState
corresponds to since we’re not passing anything likethis
back to React. We’ll answer this question and many others in the FAQ section.
Declaring state variables as a pair of
[something, setSomething]
is also handy because it lets us give
different
names to different state variables if we want to use more than one:
function ExampleWithManyStates() {
// Declare multiple state variables!
const [age, setAge] = useState(42);
const [fruit, setFruit] = useState('banana');
const [todos, setTodos] = useState([{ text: 'Learn Hooks' }]);
In the above component, we have
age
,
fruit
, and
todos
as local variables, and we can update them individually:
function handleOrangeClick() {
// Similar to this.setState({ fruit: 'orange' })
setFruit('orange');
}
You
don’t have to
use many state variables. State variables can hold objects and arrays just fine, so you can still group related data together. However, unlike
this.setState
in a class, updating a state variable always
replaces
it instead of merging it.
We provide more recommendations on splitting independent state variables in the FAQ.
On this page we’ve learned about one of the Hooks provided by React, called
useState
. We’re also sometimes going to refer to it as the “State Hook”. It lets us add local state to React function components — which we did for the first time ever!
We also learned a little bit more about what Hooks are. Hooks are functions that let you “hook into” React features from function components. Their names always start with
use
, and there are more Hooks we haven’t seen yet.
Now let’s continue by learning the next Hook:
useEffect
.
It lets you perform side effects in components, and is similar to lifecycle methods in classes.
Hooks are a new addition in React 16.8. They let you use state and other React features without writing a class.
The Effect Hook lets you perform side effects in function components:
import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react';
function Example() {
const [count, setCount] = useState(0);
// Similar to componentDidMount and componentDidUpdate: useEffect(() => { // Update the document title using the browser API document.title = `You clicked ${count} times`; });
return (
<div>
<p>You clicked {count} times</p>
<button onClick={() => setCount(count + 1)}>
Click me
</button>
</div>
);
}
This snippet is based on the counter example from the previous page, but we added a new feature to it: we set the document title to a custom message including the number of clicks.
Data fetching, setting up a subscription, and manually changing the DOM in React components are all examples of side effects. Whether or not you’re used to calling these operations “side effects” (or just “effects”), you’ve likely performed them in your components before.
Tip
If you’re familiar with React class lifecycle methods, you can think of
useEffect
Hook ascomponentDidMount
,componentDidUpdate
, andcomponentWillUnmount
combined.
There are two common kinds of side effects in React components: those that don’t require cleanup, and those that do. Let’s look at this distinction in more detail.
Sometimes, we want to run some additional code after React has updated the DOM. Network requests, manual DOM mutations, and logging are common examples of effects that don’t require a cleanup. We say that because we can run them and immediately forget about them. Let’s compare how classes and Hooks let us express such side effects.
In React class components, the
render
method itself shouldn’t cause side effects. It would be too early — we typically want to perform our effects
after
React has updated the DOM.
This is why in React classes, we put side effects into
componentDidMount
and
componentDidUpdate
. Coming back to our example, here is a React counter class component that updates the document title right after React makes changes to the DOM:
class Example extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {
count: 0
};
}
componentDidMount() { document.title = `You clicked ${this.state.count} times`; } componentDidUpdate() { document.title = `You clicked ${this.state.count} times`; }
render() {
return (
<div>
<p>You clicked {this.state.count} times</p>
<button onClick={() => this.setState({ count: this.state.count + 1 })}>
Click me
</button>
</div>
);
}
}
Note how we have to duplicate the code between these two lifecycle methods in class.
This is because in many cases we want to perform the same side effect regardless of whether the component just mounted, or if it has been updated. Conceptually, we want it to happen after every render — but React class components don’t have a method like this. We could extract a separate method but we would still have to call it in two places.
Now let’s see how we can do the same with the
useEffect
Hook.
We’ve already seen this example at the top of this page, but let’s take a closer look at it:
import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react';
function Example() {
const [count, setCount] = useState(0);
useEffect(() => { document.title = `You clicked ${count} times`; });
return (
<div>
<p>You clicked {count} times</p>
<button onClick={() => setCount(count + 1)}>
Click me
</button>
</div>
);
}
What does
useEffect
do?
By using this Hook, you tell React that your component needs to do something after render. React will remember the function you passed (we’ll refer to it as our “effect”), and call it later after performing the DOM updates. In this effect, we set the document title, but we could also perform data fetching or call some other imperative API.
Why is
useEffect
called inside a component?
Placing
useEffect
inside the component lets us access the
count
state variable (or any props) right from the effect. We don’t need a special API to read it — it’s already in the function scope. Hooks embrace JavaScript closures and avoid introducing React-specific APIs where JavaScript already provides a solution.
Does
useEffect
run after every render?
Yes! By default, it runs both after the first render
and
after every update. (We will later talk about how to customize this.) Instead of thinking in terms of “mounting” and “updating”, you might find it easier to think that effects happen “after render”. React guarantees the DOM has been updated by the time it runs the effects.
Now that we know more about effects, these lines should make sense:
function Example() {
const [count, setCount] = useState(0);
useEffect(() => {
document.title = `You clicked ${count} times`;
});
}
We declare the
count
state variable, and then we tell React we need to use an effect. We pass a function to the
useEffect
Hook. This function we pass
is
our effect. Inside our effect, we set the document title using the
document.title
browser API. We can read the latest
count
inside the effect because it’s in the scope of our function. When React renders our component, it will remember the effect we used, and then run our effect after updating the DOM. This happens for every render, including the first one.
Experienced JavaScript developers might notice that the function passed to
useEffect
is going to be different on every render. This is intentional. In fact, this is what lets us read the
count
value from inside the effect without worrying about it getting stale. Every time we re-render, we schedule a
different
effect, replacing the previous one. In a way, this makes the effects behave more like a part of the render result — each effect “belongs” to a particular render. We will see more clearly why this is useful later on this page.
Tip
Unlike
componentDidMount
orcomponentDidUpdate
, effects scheduled withuseEffect
don’t block the browser from updating the screen. This makes your app feel more responsive. The majority of effects don’t need to happen synchronously. In the uncommon cases where they do (such as measuring the layout), there is a separateuseLayoutEffect
Hook with an API identical touseEffect
.
Earlier, we looked at how to express side effects that don’t require any cleanup. However, some effects do. For example, we might want to set up a subscription to some external data source. In that case, it is important to clean up so that we don’t introduce a memory leak! Let’s compare how we can do it with classes and with Hooks.
In a React class, you would typically set up a subscription in
componentDidMount
, and clean it up in
componentWillUnmount
. For example, let’s say we have a
ChatAPI
module that lets us subscribe to a friend’s online status. Here’s how we might subscribe and display that status using a class:
class FriendStatus extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = { isOnline: null };
this.handleStatusChange = this.handleStatusChange.bind(this);
}
componentDidMount() { ChatAPI.subscribeToFriendStatus( this.props.friend.id, this.handleStatusChange ); } componentWillUnmount() { ChatAPI.unsubscribeFromFriendStatus( this.props.friend.id, this.handleStatusChange ); } handleStatusChange(status) { this.setState({ isOnline: status.isOnline }); }
render() {
if (this.state.isOnline === null) {
return 'Loading...';
}
return this.state.isOnline ? 'Online' : 'Offline';
}
}
Notice how
componentDidMount
and
componentWillUnmount
need to mirror each other. Lifecycle methods force us to split this logic even though conceptually code in both of them is related to the same effect.
Note
Eagle-eyed readers may notice that this example also needs a
componentDidUpdate
method to be fully correct. We’ll ignore this for now but will come back to it in a later section of this page.
Let’s see how we could write this component with Hooks.
You might be thinking that we’d need a separate effect to perform the cleanup. But code for adding and removing a subscription is so tightly related that
useEffect
is designed to keep it together. If your effect returns a function, React will run it when it is time to clean up:
import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react';
function FriendStatus(props) {
const [isOnline, setIsOnline] = useState(null);
useEffect(() => { function handleStatusChange(status) { setIsOnline(status.isOnline); } ChatAPI.subscribeToFriendStatus(props.friend.id, handleStatusChange); // Specify how to clean up after this effect: return function cleanup() { ChatAPI.unsubscribeFromFriendStatus(props.friend.id, handleStatusChange); }; });
if (isOnline === null) {
return 'Loading...';
}
return isOnline ? 'Online' : 'Offline';
}
Why did we return a function from our effect? This is the optional cleanup mechanism for effects. Every effect may return a function that cleans up after it. This lets us keep the logic for adding and removing subscriptions close to each other. They’re part of the same effect!
When exactly does React clean up an effect? React performs the cleanup when the component unmounts. However, as we learned earlier, effects run for every render and not just once. This is why React also cleans up effects from the previous render before running the effects next time. We’ll discuss why this helps avoid bugs and how to opt out of this behavior in case it creates performance issues later below.
Note
We don’t have to return a named function from the effect. We called it
cleanup
here to clarify its purpose, but you could return an arrow function or call it something different.
We’ve learned that
useEffect
lets us express different kinds of side effects after a component renders. Some effects might require cleanup so they return a function:
useEffect(() => {
function handleStatusChange(status) {
setIsOnline(status.isOnline);
}
ChatAPI.subscribeToFriendStatus(props.friend.id, handleStatusChange);
return () => {
ChatAPI.unsubscribeFromFriendStatus(props.friend.id, handleStatusChange);
};
});
Other effects might not have a cleanup phase, and don’t return anything.
useEffect(() => {
document.title = `You clicked ${count} times`;
});
The Effect Hook unifies both use cases with a single API.
If you feel like you have a decent grasp on how the Effect Hook works, or if you feel overwhelmed, you can jump to the next page about Rules of Hooks now.
We’ll continue this page with an in-depth look at some aspects of
useEffect
that experienced React users will likely be curious about. Don’t feel obligated to dig into them now. You can always come back to this page to learn more details about the Effect Hook.
One of the problems we outlined in the Motivation for Hooks is that class lifecycle methods often contain unrelated logic, but related logic gets broken up into several methods. Here is a component that combines the counter and the friend status indicator logic from the previous examples:
class FriendStatusWithCounter extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = { count: 0, isOnline: null };
this.handleStatusChange = this.handleStatusChange.bind(this);
}
componentDidMount() {
document.title = `You clicked ${this.state.count} times`;
ChatAPI.subscribeToFriendStatus(
this.props.friend.id,
this.handleStatusChange
);
}
componentDidUpdate() {
document.title = `You clicked ${this.state.count} times`;
}
componentWillUnmount() {
ChatAPI.unsubscribeFromFriendStatus(
this.props.friend.id,
this.handleStatusChange
);
}
handleStatusChange(status) {
this.setState({
isOnline: status.isOnline
});
}
// ...
Note how the logic that sets
document.title
is split between
componentDidMount
and
componentDidUpdate
. The subscription logic is also spread between
componentDidMount
and
componentWillUnmount
. And
componentDidMount
contains code for both tasks.
So, how can Hooks solve this problem? Just like you can use the State Hook more than once, you can also use several effects. This lets us separate unrelated logic into different effects:
function FriendStatusWithCounter(props) {
const [count, setCount] = useState(0);
useEffect(() => { document.title = `You clicked ${count} times`;
});
const [isOnline, setIsOnline] = useState(null);
useEffect(() => { function handleStatusChange(status) {
setIsOnline(status.isOnline);
}
ChatAPI.subscribeToFriendStatus(props.friend.id, handleStatusChange);
return () => {
ChatAPI.unsubscribeFromFriendStatus(props.friend.id, handleStatusChange);
};
});
// ...
}
Hooks let us split the code based on what it is doing rather than a lifecycle method name. React will apply every effect used by the component, in the order they were specified.
If you’re used to classes, you might be wondering why the effect cleanup phase happens after every re-render, and not just once during unmounting. Let’s look at a practical example to see why this design helps us create components with fewer bugs.
Earlier on this page, we introduced an example
FriendStatus
component that displays whether a friend is online or not. Our class reads
friend.id
from
this.props
, subscribes to the friend status after the component mounts, and unsubscribes during unmounting:
componentDidMount() {
ChatAPI.subscribeToFriendStatus(
this.props.friend.id,
this.handleStatusChange
);
}
componentWillUnmount() {
ChatAPI.unsubscribeFromFriendStatus(
this.props.friend.id,
this.handleStatusChange
);
}
But what happens if the
friend
prop changes
while the component is on the screen? Our component would continue displaying the online status of a different friend. This is a bug. We would also cause a memory leak or crash when unmounting since the unsubscribe call would use the wrong friend ID.
In a class component, we would need to add
componentDidUpdate
to handle this case:
componentDidMount() {
ChatAPI.subscribeToFriendStatus(
this.props.friend.id,
this.handleStatusChange
);
}
componentDidUpdate(prevProps) { // Unsubscribe from the previous friend.id ChatAPI.unsubscribeFromFriendStatus( prevProps.friend.id, this.handleStatusChange ); // Subscribe to the next friend.id ChatAPI.subscribeToFriendStatus( this.props.friend.id, this.handleStatusChange ); }
componentWillUnmount() {
ChatAPI.unsubscribeFromFriendStatus(
this.props.friend.id,
this.handleStatusChange
);
}
Forgetting to handle
componentDidUpdate
properly is a common source of bugs in React applications.
Now consider the version of this component that uses Hooks:
function FriendStatus(props) {
// ...
useEffect(() => {
// ...
ChatAPI.subscribeToFriendStatus(props.friend.id, handleStatusChange);
return () => {
ChatAPI.unsubscribeFromFriendStatus(props.friend.id, handleStatusChange);
};
});
It doesn’t suffer from this bug. (But we also didn’t make any changes to it.)
There is no special code for handling updates because
useEffect
handles them
by default
. It cleans up the previous effects before applying the next effects. To illustrate this, here is a sequence of subscribe and unsubscribe calls that this component could produce over time:
// Mount with { friend: { id: 100 } } props
ChatAPI.subscribeToFriendStatus(100, handleStatusChange); // Run first effect
// Update with { friend: { id: 200 } } props
ChatAPI.unsubscribeFromFriendStatus(100, handleStatusChange); // Clean up previous effect
ChatAPI.subscribeToFriendStatus(200, handleStatusChange); // Run next effect
// Update with { friend: { id: 300 } } props
ChatAPI.unsubscribeFromFriendStatus(200, handleStatusChange); // Clean up previous effect
ChatAPI.subscribeToFriendStatus(300, handleStatusChange); // Run next effect
// Unmount
ChatAPI.unsubscribeFromFriendStatus(300, handleStatusChange); // Clean up last effect
This behavior ensures consistency by default and prevents bugs that are common in class components due to missing update logic.
In some cases, cleaning up or applying the effect after every render might create a performance problem. In class components, we can solve this by writing an extra comparison with
prevProps
or
prevState
inside
componentDidUpdate
:
componentDidUpdate(prevProps, prevState) {
if (prevState.count !== this.state.count) {
document.title = `You clicked ${this.state.count} times`;
}
}
This requirement is common enough that it is built into the
useEffect
Hook API. You can tell React to
skip
applying an effect if certain values haven’t changed between re-renders. To do so, pass an array as an optional second argument to
useEffect
:
useEffect(() => {
document.title = `You clicked ${count} times`;
}, [count]); // Only re-run the effect if count changes
In the example above, we pass
[count]
as the second argument. What does this mean? If the
count
is
5
, and then our component re-renders with
count
still equal to
5
, React will compare
[5]
from the previous render and
[5]
from the next render. Because all items in the array are the same (
5 === 5
), React would skip the effect. That’s our optimization.
When we render with
count
updated to
6
, React will compare the items in the
[5]
array from the previous render to items in the
[6]
array from the next render. This time, React will re-apply the effect because
5 !== 6
. If there are multiple items in the array, React will re-run the effect even if just one of them is different.
This also works for effects that have a cleanup phase:
useEffect(() => {
function handleStatusChange(status) {
setIsOnline(status.isOnline);
}
ChatAPI.subscribeToFriendStatus(props.friend.id, handleStatusChange);
return () => {
ChatAPI.unsubscribeFromFriendStatus(props.friend.id, handleStatusChange);
};
}, [props.friend.id]); // Only re-subscribe if props.friend.id changes
In the future, the second argument might get added automatically by a build-time transformation.
Note
If you use this optimization, make sure the array includes all values from the component scope (such as props and state) that change over time and that are used by the effect . Otherwise, your code will reference stale values from previous renders. Learn more about how to deal with functions and what to do when the array changes too often.
If you want to run an effect and clean it up only once (on mount and unmount), you can pass an empty array (
[]
) as a second argument. This tells React that your effect doesn’t depend on any values from props or state, so it never needs to re-run. This isn’t handled as a special case — it follows directly from how the dependencies array always works.
If you pass an empty array (
[]
), the props and state inside the effect will always have their initial values. While passing[]
as the second argument is closer to the familiarcomponentDidMount
andcomponentWillUnmount
mental model, there are usually better solutions to avoid re-running effects too often. Also, don’t forget that React defers runninguseEffect
until after the browser has painted, so doing extra work is less of a problem.
We recommend using the
exhaustive-deps
rule as part of oureslint-plugin-react-hooks
package. It warns when dependencies are specified incorrectly and suggests a fix.
Congratulations! This was a long page, but hopefully by the end most of your questions about effects were answered. You’ve learned both the State Hook and the Effect Hook, and there is a lot you can do with both of them combined. They cover most of the use cases for classes — and where they don’t, you might find the additional Hooks helpful.
We’re also starting to see how Hooks solve problems outlined in Motivation. We’ve seen how effect cleanup avoids duplication in
componentDidUpdate
and
componentWillUnmount
, brings related code closer together, and helps us avoid bugs. We’ve also seen how we can separate effects by their purpose, which is something we couldn’t do in classes at all.
At this point you might be questioning how Hooks work. How can React know which
useState
call corresponds to which state variable between re-renders? How does React “match up” previous and next effects on every update?
On the next page we will learn about the Rules of Hooks — they’re essential to making Hooks work.
Hooks are a new addition in React 16.8. They let you use state and other React features without writing a class.
Hooks are JavaScript functions, but you need to follow two rules when using them. We provide a linter plugin to enforce these rules automatically:
Don’t call Hooks inside loops, conditions, or nested functions.
Instead, always use Hooks at the top level of your React function, before any early returns. By following this rule, you ensure that Hooks are called in the same order each time a component renders. That’s what allows React to correctly preserve the state of Hooks between multiple
useState
and
useEffect
calls. (If you’re curious, we’ll explain this in depth below.)
Don’t call Hooks from regular JavaScript functions. Instead, you can:
By following this rule, you ensure that all stateful logic in a component is clearly visible from its source code.
We released an ESLint plugin called
eslint-plugin-react-hooks
that enforces these two rules. You can add this plugin to your project if you’d like to try it:
This plugin is included by default in Create React App.
npm install eslint-plugin-react-hooks --save-dev
// Your ESLint configuration
{
"plugins": [
// ...
"react-hooks"
],
"rules": {
// ...
"react-hooks/rules-of-hooks": "error", // Checks rules of Hooks
"react-hooks/exhaustive-deps": "warn" // Checks effect dependencies
}
}
You can skip to the next page explaining how to write your own Hooks now. On this page, we’ll continue by explaining the reasoning behind these rules.
As we learned earlier, we can use multiple State or Effect Hooks in a single component:
function Form() {
// 1. Use the name state variable
const [name, setName] = useState('Mary');
// 2. Use an effect for persisting the form
useEffect(function persistForm() {
localStorage.setItem('formData', name);
});
// 3. Use the surname state variable
const [surname, setSurname] = useState('Poppins');
// 4. Use an effect for updating the title
useEffect(function updateTitle() {
document.title = name + ' ' + surname;
});
// ...
}
So how does React know which state corresponds to which
useState
call? The answer is that
React relies on the order in which Hooks are called
. Our example works because the order of the Hook calls is the same on every render:
// ------------
// First render
// ------------
useState('Mary') // 1. Initialize the name state variable with 'Mary'
useEffect(persistForm) // 2. Add an effect for persisting the form
useState('Poppins') // 3. Initialize the surname state variable with 'Poppins'
useEffect(updateTitle) // 4. Add an effect for updating the title
// -------------
// Second render
// -------------
useState('Mary') // 1. Read the name state variable (argument is ignored)
useEffect(persistForm) // 2. Replace the effect for persisting the form
useState('Poppins') // 3. Read the surname state variable (argument is ignored)
useEffect(updateTitle) // 4. Replace the effect for updating the title
// ...
As long as the order of the Hook calls is the same between renders, React can associate some local state with each of them. But what happens if we put a Hook call (for example, the
persistForm
effect) inside a condition?
// 🔴 We're breaking the first rule by using a Hook in a condition
if (name !== '') {
useEffect(function persistForm() {
localStorage.setItem('formData', name);
});
}
The
name !== ''
condition is
true
on the first render, so we run this Hook. However, on the next render the user might clear the form, making the condition
false
. Now that we skip this Hook during rendering, the order of the Hook calls becomes different:
useState('Mary') // 1. Read the name state variable (argument is ignored)
// useEffect(persistForm) // 🔴 This Hook was skipped!
useState('Poppins') // 🔴 2 (but was 3). Fail to read the surname state variable
useEffect(updateTitle) // 🔴 3 (but was 4). Fail to replace the effect
React wouldn’t know what to return for the second
useState
Hook call. React expected that the second Hook call in this component corresponds to the
persistForm
effect, just like during the previous render, but it doesn’t anymore. From that point, every next Hook call after the one we skipped would also shift by one, leading to bugs.
This is why Hooks must be called on the top level of our components. If we want to run an effect conditionally, we can put that condition inside our Hook:
useEffect(function persistForm() {
// 👍 We're not breaking the first rule anymore
if (name !== '') {
localStorage.setItem('formData', name);
}
});
Note that you don’t need to worry about this problem if you use the provided lint rule. But now you also know why Hooks work this way, and which issues the rule is preventing.
Finally, we’re ready to learn about writing your own Hooks! Custom Hooks let you combine Hooks provided by React into your own abstractions, and reuse common stateful logic between different components.
Hooks are a new addition in React 16.8. They let you use state and other React features without writing a class.
Building your own Hooks lets you extract component logic into reusable functions.
When we were learning about using the Effect Hook, we saw this component from a chat application that displays a message indicating whether a friend is online or offline:
import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react';
function FriendStatus(props) {
const [isOnline, setIsOnline] = useState(null); useEffect(() => { function handleStatusChange(status) { setIsOnline(status.isOnline); } ChatAPI.subscribeToFriendStatus(props.friend.id, handleStatusChange); return () => { ChatAPI.unsubscribeFromFriendStatus(props.friend.id, handleStatusChange); }; });
if (isOnline === null) {
return 'Loading...';
}
return isOnline ? 'Online' : 'Offline';
}
Now let’s say that our chat application also has a contact list, and we want to render names of online users with a green color. We could copy and paste similar logic above into our
FriendListItem
component but it wouldn’t be ideal:
import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react';
function FriendListItem(props) {
const [isOnline, setIsOnline] = useState(null); useEffect(() => { function handleStatusChange(status) { setIsOnline(status.isOnline); } ChatAPI.subscribeToFriendStatus(props.friend.id, handleStatusChange); return () => { ChatAPI.unsubscribeFromFriendStatus(props.friend.id, handleStatusChange); }; });
return (
<li style={{ color: isOnline ? 'green' : 'black' }}>
{props.friend.name}
</li>
);
}
Instead, we’d like to share this logic between
FriendStatus
and
FriendListItem
.
Traditionally in React, we’ve had two popular ways to share stateful logic between components: render props and higher-order components. We will now look at how Hooks solve many of the same problems without forcing you to add more components to the tree.
When we want to share logic between two JavaScript functions, we extract it to a third function. Both components and Hooks are functions, so this works for them too!
A custom Hook is a JavaScript function whose name starts with ”
use
” and that may call other Hooks.
For example,
useFriendStatus
below is our first custom Hook:
import { useState, useEffect } from 'react';
function useFriendStatus(friendID) { const [isOnline, setIsOnline] = useState(null);
useEffect(() => {
function handleStatusChange(status) {
setIsOnline(status.isOnline);
}
ChatAPI.subscribeToFriendStatus(friendID, handleStatusChange);
return () => {
ChatAPI.unsubscribeFromFriendStatus(friendID, handleStatusChange);
};
});
return isOnline;
}
There’s nothing new inside of it — the logic is copied from the components above. Just like in a component, make sure to only call other Hooks unconditionally at the top level of your custom Hook.
Unlike a React component, a custom Hook doesn’t need to have a specific signature. We can decide what it takes as arguments, and what, if anything, it should return. In other words, it’s just like a normal function. Its name should always start with
use
so that you can tell at a glance that the rules of Hooks apply to it.
The purpose of our
useFriendStatus
Hook is to subscribe us to a friend’s status. This is why it takes
friendID
as an argument, and returns whether this friend is online:
function useFriendStatus(friendID) {
const [isOnline, setIsOnline] = useState(null);
// ...
return isOnline;
}
Now let’s see how we can use our custom Hook.
In the beginning, our stated goal was to remove the duplicated logic from the
FriendStatus
and
FriendListItem
components. Both of them want to know whether a friend is online.
Now that we’ve extracted this logic to a
useFriendStatus
hook, we can
just use it:
function FriendStatus(props) {
const isOnline = useFriendStatus(props.friend.id);
if (isOnline === null) {
return 'Loading...';
}
return isOnline ? 'Online' : 'Offline';
}
function FriendListItem(props) {
const isOnline = useFriendStatus(props.friend.id);
return (
<li style={{ color: isOnline ? 'green' : 'black' }}>
{props.friend.name}
</li>
);
}
Is this code equivalent to the original examples? Yes, it works in exactly the same way. If you look closely, you’ll notice we didn’t make any changes to the behavior. All we did was to extract some common code between two functions into a separate function. Custom Hooks are a convention that naturally follows from the design of Hooks, rather than a React feature.
Do I have to name my custom Hooks starting with “
use
”?
Please do. This convention is very important. Without it, we wouldn’t be able to automatically check for violations of rules of Hooks because we couldn’t tell if a certain function contains calls to Hooks inside of it.
Do two components using the same Hook share state? No. Custom Hooks are a mechanism to reuse stateful logic (such as setting up a subscription and remembering the current value), but every time you use a custom Hook, all state and effects inside of it are fully isolated.
How does a custom Hook get isolated state?
Each
call
to a Hook gets isolated state. Because we call
useFriendStatus
directly, from React’s point of view our component just calls
useState
and
useEffect
. And as we learned earlier, we can call
useState
and
useEffect
many times in one component, and they will be completely independent.
Since Hooks are functions, we can pass information between them.
To illustrate this, we’ll use another component from our hypothetical chat example. This is a chat message recipient picker that displays whether the currently selected friend is online:
const friendList = [
{ id: 1, name: 'Phoebe' },
{ id: 2, name: 'Rachel' },
{ id: 3, name: 'Ross' },
];
function ChatRecipientPicker() {
const [recipientID, setRecipientID] = useState(1); const isRecipientOnline = useFriendStatus(recipientID);
return (
<>
<Circle color={isRecipientOnline ? 'green' : 'red'} /> <select
value={recipientID}
onChange={e => setRecipientID(Number(e.target.value))}
>
{friendList.map(friend => (
<option key={friend.id} value={friend.id}>
{friend.name}
</option>
))}
</select>
</>
);
}
We keep the currently chosen friend ID in the
recipientID
state variable, and update it if the user chooses a different friend in the
<select>
picker.
Because the
useState
Hook call gives us the latest value of the
recipientID
state variable, we can pass it to our custom
useFriendStatus
Hook as an argument:
const [recipientID, setRecipientID] = useState(1);
const isRecipientOnline = useFriendStatus(recipientID);
This lets us know whether the
currently selected
friend is online. If we pick a different friend and update the
recipientID
state variable, our
useFriendStatus
Hook will unsubscribe from the previously selected friend, and subscribe to the status of the newly selected one.
useYourImagination()
Custom Hooks offer the flexibility of sharing logic that wasn’t possible in React components before. You can write custom Hooks that cover a wide range of use cases like form handling, animation, declarative subscriptions, timers, and probably many more we haven’t considered. What’s more, you can build Hooks that are just as easy to use as React’s built-in features.
Try to resist adding abstraction too early. Now that function components can do more, it’s likely that the average function component in your codebase will become longer. This is normal — don’t feel like you have to immediately split it into Hooks. But we also encourage you to start spotting cases where a custom Hook could hide complex logic behind a simple interface, or help untangle a messy component.
For example, maybe you have a complex component that contains a lot of local state that is managed in an ad-hoc way.
useState
doesn’t make centralizing the update logic any easier so you might prefer to write it as a Redux reducer:
function todosReducer(state, action) {
switch (action.type) {
case 'add':
return [...state, {
text: action.text,
completed: false
}];
// ... other actions ...
default:
return state;
}
}
Reducers are very convenient to test in isolation, and scale to express complex update logic. You can further break them apart into smaller reducers if necessary. However, you might also enjoy the benefits of using React local state, or might not want to install another library.
So what if we could write a
useReducer
Hook that lets us manage the
local
state of our component with a reducer? A simplified version of it might look like this:
function useReducer(reducer, initialState) {
const [state, setState] = useState(initialState);
function dispatch(action) {
const nextState = reducer(state, action);
setState(nextState);
}
return [state, dispatch];
}
Now we could use it in our component, and let the reducer drive its state management:
function Todos() {
const [todos, dispatch] = useReducer(todosReducer, []);
function handleAddClick(text) {
dispatch({ type: 'add', text });
}
// ...
}
The need to manage local state with a reducer in a complex component is common enough that we’ve built the
useReducer
Hook right into React. You’ll find it together with other built-in Hooks in the Hooks API reference.