Angular package format link
This document describes the Angular Package Format (APF).
APF is an Angular specific specification for the structure and format of npm packages that is used by all first-party Angular packages (
@angular/core
,
@angular/material
, etc.) and most third-party Angular libraries.
APF enables a package to work seamlessly under most common scenarios that use Angular. Packages that use APF are compatible with the tooling offered by the Angular team as well as wider JavaScript ecosystem. It is recommended that third-party library developers follow the same npm package format.
APF is versioned along with the rest of Angular, and every major version improves the package format. You can find the versions of the specification prior to v13 in this google doc.
Why specify a package format? link
In today's JavaScript landscape, developers consume packages in many different ways, using many different toolchains (Webpack, rollup, esbuild, etc.). These tools may understand and require different inputs - some tools may be able to process the latest ES language version, while others may benefit from directly consuming an older ES version.
The Angular distribution format supports all of the commonly used development tools and workflows, and adds emphasis on optimizations that result either in smaller application payload size or faster development iteration cycle (build time).
Developers can rely on Angular CLI and ng-packagr (a build tool Angular CLI uses) to produce packages in the Angular package format. See the Creating Libraries guide for more details.
File layout link
The following example shows a simplified version of the
@angular/core
package's file layout, with an explanation for each file in the package.
This table describes the file layout under
node_modules/@angular/core
annotated to describe the purpose of files and directories:
Files | Purpose |
---|---|
README.md
|
Package README, used by npmjs web UI. |
package.json
|
Primary
package.json
, describing the package itself as well as all available entrypoints and code formats. This file contains the "exports" mapping used by runtimes and tools to perform module resolution.
|
index.d.ts
|
Bundled
.d.ts
for the primary entrypoint
@angular/core
.
|
esm2020/
─
core.mjs
─
index.mjs
─
public_api.mjs
|
Tree of
@angular/core
sources in unflattened ES2020 format.
|
esm2020/testing/
|
Tree of the
@angular/core/testing
entrypoint in unflattened ES2020 format.
|
fesm2015/
─
core.mjs
─
core.mjs.map
─
testing.mjs
─
testing.mjs.map
|
Code for all entrypoints in a flattened (FESM) ES2015 format, along with source maps. |
fesm2020/
─
core.mjs
─
core.mjs.map
─
testing.mjs
─
testing.mjs.map
|
Code for all entrypoints in flattened (FESM) ES2020 format, along with source maps. |
testing/
|
Directory representing the "testing" entrypoint. |
testing/index.d.ts
|
Bundled
.d.ts
for the
@angular/core/testing
entrypoint.
|
package.json
link
The primary
package.json
contains important package metadata, including the following:
-
It declares the package to be in EcmaScript Module (ESM) format
-
It contains an
"exports"
field which defines the available source code formats of all entrypoints -
It contains keys which define the available source code formats of the primary
@angular/core
entrypoint, for tools which do not understand"exports"
. These keys are considered deprecated, and could be removed as the support for"exports"
rolls out across the ecosystem. -
It declares whether the package contains side effects
ESM declaration link
The top-level
package.json
contains the key:
{
"type": "module"
}
This informs resolvers that code within the package is using EcmaScript Modules as opposed to CommonJS modules.
"exports"
link
The
"exports"
field has the following structure:
"exports": {
"./schematics/*": {
"default": "./schematics/*.js"
},
"./package.json": {
"default": "./package.json"
},
".": {
"types": "./core.d.ts",
"esm2020": "./esm2020/core.mjs",
"es2020": "./fesm2020/core.mjs",
"es2015": "./fesm2015/core.mjs",
"node": "./fesm2015/core.mjs",
"default": "./fesm2020/core.mjs"
},
"./testing": {
"types": "./testing/testing.d.ts",
"esm2020": "./esm2020/testing/testing.mjs",
"es2020": "./fesm2020/testing.mjs",
"es2015": "./fesm2015/testing.mjs",
"node": "./fesm2015/testing.mjs",
"default": "./fesm2020/testing.mjs"
}
}
Of primary interest are the
"."
and the
"./testing"
keys, which define the available code formats for the
@angular/core
primary entrypoint and the
@angular/core/testing
secondary entrypoint, respectively.
For each entrypoint, the available formats are:
Formats | Details |
---|---|
Typings (
.d.ts
files)
|
.d.ts
files are used by TypeScript when depending on a given package.
|
es2020
|
ES2020 code flattened into a single source file. |
es2015
|
ES2015 code flattened into a single source file. |
esm2020
|
ES2020 code in unflattened source files (this format is included for experimentation - see this discussion of defaults for details). |
Tooling that is aware of these keys may preferentially select a desirable code format from
"exports"
.
The remaining 2 keys control the default behavior of tooling:
-
"node"
selects flattened ES2015 code when the package is loaded in Node.This format is used due to the requirements of
zone.js
, which does not support nativeasync
/await
ES2017 syntax. Therefore, Node is instructed to use ES2015 code, whereasync
/await
structures have been downleveled into Promises. -
"default"
selects flattened ES2020 code for all other consumers.
Libraries may want to expose additional static files which are not captured by the exports of the JavaScript-based entry-points such as Sass mixins or pre-compiled CSS.
For more information, see Managing assets in a library.
Legacy resolution keys link
In addition to
"exports"
, the top-level
package.json
also defines legacy module resolution keys for resolvers that don't support
"exports"
.
For
@angular/core
these are:
{
"fesm2020": "./fesm2020/core.mjs",
"fesm2015": "./fesm2015/core.mjs",
"esm2020": "./esm2020/core.mjs",
"typings": "./core.d.ts",
"module": "./fesm2015/core.mjs",
"es2020": "./fesm2020/core.mjs",
}
As shown in the preceding code snippet, a module resolver can use these keys to load a specific code format.
NOTE
:
Instead of
"default"
,
"module"
selects the format both for Node as well as any tooling not configured to use a specific key.
As with
"node"
, ES2015 code is selected due to the constraints of ZoneJS.
Side effects link
The last function of
package.json
is to declare whether the package has side effects.
{
"sideEffects": false
}
Most Angular packages should not depend on top-level side effects, and thus should include this declaration.
Entrypoints and code splitting link
Packages in the Angular Package Format contain one primary entrypoint and zero or more secondary entrypoints (for example,
@angular/common/http
).
Entrypoints serve several functions.
-
They define the module specifiers from which users import code (for example,
@angular/core
and@angular/core/testing
).Users typically perceive these entrypoints as distinct groups of symbols, with different purposes or capability.
Specific entrypoints might only be used for special purposes, such as testing. Such APIs can be separated out from the primary entrypoint to reduce the chance of them being used accidentally or incorrectly.
-
They define the granularity at which code can be lazily loaded.
Many modern build tools are only capable of "code splitting" (aka lazy loading) at the ES Module level. The Angular Package Format uses primarily a single "flat" ES Module per entry point. This means that most build tooling is not able to split code with a single entry point into multiple output chunks.
The general rule for APF packages is to use entrypoints for the smallest sets of logically connected code possible. For example, the Angular Material package publishes each logical component or set of components as a separate entrypoint - one for Button, one for Tabs, etc. This allows each Material component to be lazily loaded separately, if desired.
Not all libraries require such granularity.
Most libraries with a single logical purpose should be published as a single entrypoint.
@angular/core
for example uses a single entrypoint for the runtime, because the Angular runtime is generally used as a single entity.
Resolution of secondary entry points link
Secondary entrypoints can be resolved via the
"exports"
field of the
package.json
for the package.
README.md link
The README file in the Markdown format that is used to display description of a package on npm and GitHub.
Example README content of @angular/core package:
Angular
=======
The sources for this package are in the main [Angular](https://github.com/angular/angular) repo.Please file issues and pull requests against that repo.
License: MIT
Partial compilation link
Libraries in the Angular Package Format must be published in "partial compilation" mode.
This is a compilation mode for
ngc
which produces compiled Angular code that is not tied to a specific Angular runtime version, in contrast to the full compilation used for applications, where the Angular compiler and runtime versions must match exactly.
To partially compile Angular code, use the
compilationMode
flag in the
angularCompilerOptions
property of your
tsconfig.json
:
{
…
"angularCompilerOptions": {
"compilationMode": "partial",
}
}
Partially compiled library code is then converted to fully compiled code during the application build process by the Angular CLI.
If your build pipeline does not use the Angular CLI then refer to the Consuming partial ivy code outside the Angular CLI guide.
Optimizations link
Flattening of ES modules link
The Angular Package Format specifies that code be published in "flattened" ES module format. This significantly reduces the build time of Angular applications as well as download and parse time of the final application bundle. Please check out the excellent post "The cost of small modules" by Nolan Lawson.
The Angular compiler can generate index ES module files. Tools like Rollup can use these files to generate flattened modules in a Flattened ES Module (FESM) file format.
FESM is a file format created by flattening all ES Modules accessible from an entrypoint into a single ES Module. It's formed by following all imports from a package and copying that code into a single file while preserving all public ES exports and removing all private imports.
The abbreviated name, FESM, pronounced phe-som , can be followed by a number such as FESM5 or FESM2015. The number refers to the language level of the JavaScript inside the module. Accordingly a FESM5 file would be ESM+ES5 and include import/export statements and ES5 source code.
To generate a flattened ES Module index file, use the following configuration options in your tsconfig.json file:
{
"compilerOptions": {
…
"module": "esnext",
"target": "es2020",
…
},
"angularCompilerOptions": {
…
"flatModuleOutFile": "my-ui-lib.js",
"flatModuleId": "my-ui-lib"
}
}
Once the index file (for example,
my-ui-lib.js
) is generated by ngc, bundlers and optimizers like Rollup can be used to produce the flattened ESM file.
Note about the defaults in package.json link
As of webpack v4, the flattening of ES modules optimization should not be necessary for webpack users. It should be possible to get better code-splitting without flattening of modules in webpack.
In practice, size regressions can still be seen when using unflattened modules as input for webpack v4.
This is why
module
and
es2020
package.json entries still point to FESM files.
This issue is being investigated. It is expected to switch the
module
and
es2020
package.json entry points to unflattened files after the size regression issue is resolved.
The APF currently includes unflattened ESM2020 code for the purpose of validating such a future change.
"sideEffects" flag link
By default, EcmaScript Modules are side-effectful: importing from a module ensures that any code at the top level of that module should run. This is often undesirable, as most side-effectful code in typical modules is not truly side-effectful, but instead only affects specific symbols. If those symbols are not imported and used, it's often desirable to remove them in an optimization process known as tree-shaking, and the side-effectful code can prevent this.
Build tools such as Webpack support a flag which allows packages to declare that they do not depend on side-effectful code at the top level of their modules, giving the tools more freedom to tree-shake code from the package.
The end result of these optimizations should be smaller bundle size and better code distribution in bundle chunks after code-splitting.
This optimization can break your code if it contains non-local side-effects - this is however not common in Angular applications and it's usually a sign of bad design.
The recommendation is for all packages to claim the side-effect free status by setting the
sideEffects
property to
false
, and that developers follow the Angular Style Guide which naturally results in code without non-local side-effects.
More info: webpack docs on side effects
ES2020 language level link
ES2020 Language level is now the default language level that is consumed by Angular CLI and other tooling. The Angular CLI down-levels the bundle to a language level that is supported by all targeted browsers at application build time.
d.ts bundling / type definition flattening link
As of APF v8 it is now preferred to run API Extractor, to bundle TypeScript definitions so that the entire API appears in a single file.
In prior APF versions each entry point would have a
src
directory next to the .d.ts entry point and this directory contained individual d.ts files matching the structure of the original source code.
While this distribution format is still allowed and supported, it is highly discouraged because it confuses tools like IDEs that then offer incorrect autocompletion, and allows users to depend on deep-import paths which are typically not considered to be public API of a library or a package.
Tslib link
As of APF v10, it is recommended to add tslib as a direct dependency of your primary entry-point. This is because the tslib version is tied to the TypeScript version used to compile your library.
Examples link
- @angular/core package
- @angular/material package
Definition of terms link
The following terms are used throughout this document intentionally. In this section are the definitions of all of them to provide additional clarity.
Package link
The smallest set of files that are published to NPM and installed together, for example
@angular/core
.
This package includes a manifest called package.json, compiled source code, typescript definition files, source maps, metadata, etc.
The package is installed with
npm install @angular/core
.
Symbol link
A class, function, constant, or variable contained in a module and optionally made visible to the external world via a module export.
Module link
Short for ECMAScript Modules. A file containing statements that import and export symbols. This is identical to the definition of modules in the ECMAScript spec.
ESM link
Short for ECMAScript Modules (see above).
FESM link
Short for Flattened ES Modules and consists of a file format created by flattening all ES Modules accessible from an entry point into a single ES Module.
Module ID link
The identifier of a module used in the import statements (for example,
@angular/core
).
The ID often maps directly to a path on the filesystem, but this is not always the case due to various module resolution strategies.
Module specifier link
A module identifier (see above).
Module resolution strategy link
Algorithm used to convert Module IDs to paths on the filesystem. Node.js has one that is well specified and widely used, TypeScript supports several module resolution strategies, Closure Compiler has yet another strategy.
Module format link
Specification of the module syntax that covers at minimum the syntax for the importing and exporting from a file. Common module formats are CommonJS (CJS, typically used for Node.js applications) or ECMAScript Modules (ESM). The module format indicates only the packaging of the individual modules, but not the JavaScript language features used to make up the module content. Because of this, the Angular team often uses the language level specifier as a suffix to the module format, (for example, ESM+ES2015 specifies that the module is in ESM format and contains code down-leveled to ES2015).
Bundle link
An artifact in the form of a single JS file, produced by a build tool (for example, Webpack or Rollup) that contains symbols originating in one or more modules. Bundles are a browser-specific workaround that reduce network strain that would be caused if browsers were to start downloading hundreds if not tens of thousands of files. Node.js typically doesn't use bundles. Common bundle formats are UMD and System.register.
Language level link
The language of the code (ES2015 or ES2020). Independent of the module format.
Entry point link
A module intended to be imported by the user.
It is referenced by a unique module ID and exports the public API referenced by that module ID.
An example is
@angular/core
or
@angular/core/testing
.
Both entry points exist in the
@angular/core
package, but they export different symbols.
A package can have many entry points.
Deep import link
A process of retrieving symbols from modules that are not Entry Points. These module IDs are usually considered to be private APIs that can change over the lifetime of the project or while the bundle for the given package is being created.
Top-Level import link
An import coming from an entry point.
The available top-level imports are what define the public API and are exposed in "@angular/name" modules, such as
@angular/core
or
@angular/common
.
Tree-shaking link
The process of identifying and removing code not used by an application - also known as dead code elimination. This is a global optimization performed at the application level using tools like Rollup, Closure Compiler, or Terser.
AOT compiler link
The Ahead of Time Compiler for Angular.
Flattened type definitions link
The bundled TypeScript definitions generated from API Extractor.