Looking to implement or upgrade Editorial Manager?
Schedule a Meeting
Manuscript Management

Editorial Manager

Streamline scholarly publishing with intelligent manuscript management and peer review automation

HIPAA, SOC 2 Type II
5000+
ISO 27001
Category
Software
Ideal For
Academic Publishers
Deployment
Cloud / On-premise / Hybrid
Integrations
50++ Apps
Security
Role-based access control, data encryption, audit trails, IP whitelisting, SAML authentication
API Access
Yes - RESTful API for custom integrations and third-party connectivity

About Editorial Manager

Editorial Manager is a comprehensive online manuscript submission and peer review platform designed specifically for academic publishers, scholarly journals, and research institutions. The system streamlines the entire editorial workflow from initial submission through final publication, enabling editors to manage complex review processes efficiently while maintaining communication with authors and reviewers. Core functionality includes customizable submission forms, automated reviewer assignment, workflow tracking, decision management, and integrated communication tools. The platform reduces administrative overhead through automation of routine tasks, improving manuscript turnaround times and publication quality. AiDOOS enhances Editorial Manager deployment by providing flexible governance options across cloud, on-premise, and hybrid environments, ensuring organizations can scale their publishing operations without infrastructure constraints. Integration capabilities connect seamlessly with publishing systems, reference management tools, and institutional repositories, while advanced analytics provide insights into editorial performance and bottleneck identification for continuous optimization.

Challenges It Solves

  • Manual manuscript tracking and reviewer coordination creating bottlenecks in editorial workflow
  • Inconsistent communication between editors, reviewers, and authors leading to delays and confusion
  • Difficulty managing multiple submission formats and maintaining standardized review criteria across submissions
  • Lack of transparency in editorial decision-making causing author frustration and reduced journal reputation
  • Time-consuming administrative tasks diverting editorial resources from quality assessment

Proven Results

64
Reduction in manuscript processing time from submission to decision
48
Increase in reviewer response rates through automated reminders
35
Improvement in publication quality through standardized peer review

Key Features

Core capabilities at a glance

Intelligent Manuscript Submission

Customizable submission forms and validation

Streamlines initial intake and ensures complete manuscript information capture

Automated Reviewer Assignment

AI-powered reviewer matching based on expertise

Reduces assignment time by 70% while improving review quality

Configurable Workflow Management

Tailor editorial processes to journal requirements

Enables multi-stage reviews, revisions, and conditional acceptances seamlessly

Real-Time Collaboration Portal

Centralized communication for all stakeholders

Eliminates email fragmentation and improves decision transparency

Advanced Analytics Dashboard

Monitor editorial metrics and performance KPIs

Identifies workflow bottlenecks and enables data-driven optimization

Integration Capabilities

Connect with publishing systems and repositories

Seamless data flow reduces manual data entry and system silos

Ready to implement Editorial Manager for your organization?

Real-World Use Cases

See how organizations drive results

High-Volume Journal Operations
Large academic journals managing thousands of submissions annually can leverage Editorial Manager to automate reviewer assignments, track manuscript status in real-time, and maintain consistent quality standards across all submissions.
72
Processing capacity increased by 45% with same staffing
Multi-Disciplinary Publishing Networks
University presses and institutional publishers can configure separate workflows for different subject areas while maintaining unified editorial oversight and consistent brand standards across all publications.
58
Cross-journal collaboration improved manuscript quality metrics
Open Access and Hybrid Publishing
Publishers managing both open access and subscription models can implement differentiated workflows, track funding compliance, and maintain separate review standards within a single integrated platform.
64
Open access publication timeline reduced to 120 days
Institutional Research Output Management
Research institutions and universities can use Editorial Manager to coordinate internal peer review of faculty research, manage institutional journal collections, and ensure compliance with funding agency requirements.
51
Research publication turnaround reduced by 6 weeks

Integrations

Seamlessly connect with your tech ecosystem

C

CrossRef

Explore

Automatic DOI registration and metadata submission for published articles

S

Scopus

Explore

Integration for citation tracking and research impact analysis

W

Web of Science

Explore

Citation indexing and journal impact factor data synchronization

O

ORCID

Explore

Author identification and research profile integration for accurate attribution

M

Mendeley/Zotero

Explore

Reference management integration for reviewer expertise verification

M

Microsoft Office 365

Explore

Document collaboration and native file support for manuscript review

I

Institutional Repositories

Explore

Automated deposit of published articles to institutional archives

E

Email Systems

Explore

SMTP integration for automated notifications and correspondence management

Implementation with AiDOOS

Outcome-based delivery with expert support

Outcome-Based

Pay for results, not hours

Milestone-Driven

Clear deliverables at each phase

Expert Network

Access to certified specialists

Implementation Timeline

1
Discover
Requirements & assessment
2
Integrate
Setup & data migration
3
Validate
Testing & security audit
4
Rollout
Deployment & training
5
Optimize
Performance tuning

See how it works for your team

Alternatives & Comparisons

Find the right fit for your needs

Capability Editorial Manager QLab Zinio Pro Manuscript Manager
Customization Excellent Excellent Good Good
Ease of Use Good Good Good Excellent
Enterprise Features Excellent Excellent Excellent Good
Pricing Good Fair Fair Fair
Integration Ecosystem Good Excellent Good Good
Mobile Experience Fair Fair Excellent Good
AI & Analytics Good Poor Good Fair
Quick Setup Good Good Good Good

Similar Products

Explore related solutions

QLab

QLab

QLab is a robust software suite designed for creating and managing multimedia performances, with a …

Explore
Zinio Pro

Zinio Pro

Zinio Pro is a comprehensive digital publishing platform designed to help publishers transform thei…

Explore
Manuscript Manager

Manuscript Manager

Manuscript Manager is an intuitive, cloud-based manuscript submission and peer review system design…

Explore

Frequently Asked Questions

Can Editorial Manager handle different review types within the same journal?
Yes, Editorial Manager supports customizable workflow configurations enabling single-blind, double-blind, open, and editorial-only reviews. You can assign different review types to different submission categories or let editors choose per manuscript.
How does Editorial Manager integrate with our existing publishing systems?
Editorial Manager provides RESTful APIs and pre-built connectors for major publishing platforms, institutional repositories, and indexing services. AiDOOS can help configure custom integrations and middleware solutions for seamless data synchronization.
What kind of analytics and reporting does the platform provide?
The system offers comprehensive dashboards tracking submission metrics, reviewer performance, decision timelines, acceptance rates, and publication lag. Custom reports can be generated for editorial boards and institutional stakeholders.
Can we migrate our existing manuscript data from another system?
Yes, Editorial Manager provides data migration services supporting imports from competing systems. AiDOOS can coordinate the migration process, data validation, and stakeholder training to ensure smooth transition.
How is reviewer anonymity maintained in the platform?
Editorial Manager implements strict anonymization protocols, preventing reviewer identity disclosure during blind review processes. The system controls access to reviewer information and maintains separate communication channels to protect confidentiality.
Is Editorial Manager compliant with research data regulations like GDPR?
Yes, Editorial Manager includes GDPR compliance features including data subject access requests, consent management, and right-to-be-forgotten capabilities. The platform supports both EU and international regulatory requirements for research data.